Cheri
My opinion on political and healthcare issues!
Cheri
I'm not the only one who thinks that Sarah Palin's performance at last night's debate was not only lack-luster, but a complete mockery of the office of VP (with all those winks and phony nods). I actually made a blog post and podcast episode about this here on my main blog. However, I wanted to share part of an article written by Michelle Goldberg of The Guardian UK:
And so she preceded, with an almost surreal disregard for the subjects she was supposed to be discussing, to unleash fusillades of scripted attack lines, platitudes, lies, gibberish and grating references to her own pseudo-folksy authenticity.
It was an appalling display. The only reason it was not widely described as much is that too many American pundits don't even try to judge the truth, wisdom or reasonableness of the political rhetoric they are paid to pronounce upon. Instead, they imagine themselves as interpreters of a mythical mass of "average Americans" who they both venerate and despise.
Source: Flirting her way to victory
This has to be one of the most spot on descriptions of Palin's performance that I've read today. The world is watching, and the last thing I want the world to think about the US is that our citizens are so apathetic and asleep at the wheel that we have sunk so low as to elect a clearly unqualified person to one of the highest offices in the nation. This simply cannot be allowed.
The painting of the women of The View hunting down John McCain like it's a witch hunt is hilarious! I guess this artist won't be voting for the McCain-Palin ticket. Take a look (lol):
I actually thought Sarah Palin's response to this question was pretty good. She' just got to learn to stop rambling on. Just state it and state it plain please. The other issue is that I don't believe that for one moment she will actually respect the separation of church and state. Unfortuantely, if elected, I believe that she will do all that she can to attempt to impose her personal views on the rest of us.
Biden did a pretty good job of answering this question as well. His answer was quite practical and came across as genuine and believable. He's an old pro though, so this didn't surprise me a bit.
Labels: Domestic Politics, Politics, Sarah Palin
This episode covers a variety of topics related to Election 2008. We discussed everything from the real reason why we think McCain tried to delay the presidential debate to the economic bail-out and whether Palin is a viable substitute for Hillary Clinton voters.
CNN's Jack Cafferty doesn't think Palin's ready to lead, and neither do I. Oh, and Jack Cafferty's not the only one who feels this way. Judith Warner of the New York Times said the following:
You can see Sarah Palin get OWNED by CNN's Jack Cafferty and read about it in my article here, and in the following video:
What's the real reason McCain wants to postpone the debate? Listen as we share our theories and get to the bottom of it:
How many times have we heard both Palin and McCain make reference to the infamous "Bridge to Nowhere" that Sarah Palin claims to have stopped? Of course we all know that was a thinly veiled deception considering that she was for the bridge up untilthe point when it was obvious that it wasn't going to happen.
What we really need to be concerned about is that McCain and Palin are trying to build a bridge to "somewhere"...
Take a listen to my podcast on the subject:
Links to sites and articles mentioned on the podcast:
The 12 Lies of Sarah Palin (article by Andrew Sullivan of The Daily Dish)
FactCheck.org (where you can get the truth about political misrepresentations)
I really wanted my first post on politics & healthcare to be a serious one, but after viewing the following video I knew that it must be shared with you. I, like millions of Americans watched Palin's first interview with Charlie Gibson a week or two ago. Up until this point we knew very little about Palin's ability to presented herself unscripted. While her RNC speech was excellently delivered it left me wondering about who Sarah Palin really was; beyond the fashionable Kawaski glasses and stylish updo.
After watching the interview, I came to the conclusion that not only did Palin come off as incapable of original thought, but she didn't make very much sense on the points that matter to me. I am so sick of hearing the "terrorists are hellbent on destroying us" and "they hate us because we're free" fodder. Her "programmers" really need to diversify their messages because she sounded like such a robot in this interview.
Although the following video is a reinactment, it's not really far from what went down in the actual interview. In the words of the interiewer, "I feel stupider after having listened to [her]." Take a look:
An for those of you who actually want to see the original train wreck, here's Palin's real interview with Charlie Gibson:
Labels: 2008 Election, Politics, Sarah Palin